…and Republicans want to make sure we don’t miss it. I received this newsletter from my representative, Congressman Hayes. It prompted the following response:
Dear Congressman Hayes,
I just read your most recent newsletter in which you stated, “Speaker Pelosi decided to adjourn the House last week and send Congress home despite the fact this critical security authority had expired.” This is simply not true. Only the expanded powers have elapsed. Similar claims were made when the Protect America Act expired in February, even though provisions in that act continue for a year after its expiration.
I am severely disappointed that my representative would propagate a falsehood for the purpose of scoring political points. Worse yet, this biased spin uses the tactic of fear mongering! Though little power actually changes, your newsletter makes it sound as if we are somehow less safe now then last week.
The fight over FISA is part of a larger, ideological battle taking place in our government. The debate is over which liberties we, as a nation, are willing to sacrifice in order to achieve more security. Unfortunately, the reaction to 911 has been severely disproportional to the true threat. Americans are three thousand times more likely to be killed by firearms than by terrorists. Yet all of our restrictions on liberties have not been on firearms, but on fighting the small threat of terrorism. This is indefensible.
When it comes to whether I’m willing to give up my liberties for more security, Read the rest of this entry »





















